Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Technopolis Group

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has recently published a news item about their use of Technopolis Group’s findings in trialling interventions in the peer review process.

UKRI has adopted the Technopolis Group report as a key evidence base for interventions designed to make peer review processes more efficient, relevant, and of higher quality, while promoting greater diversity in the range of projects and researchers funded.

Review of Peer Review

The report conducted by Technopolis UK and published last year presented the findings of a study commissioned by UKRI to review interventions to the peer review processes used in R&I award funding.

The study assessed 38 interventions, which range from small process ‘tweaks’ such as increasing and decreasing the number of reviewers per application and shortening application sections, to more fundamental changes such as partial randomisation and complete bypass of peer review.

Quelles nouveautés ?

Tous les articles Toutes les nouvelles